Excuse me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't the Ichidan Conjugation Steps in the Casual, Past Negative section also have the step 2 " Add なかった to make the negative form.", or are we supposed to just infer that the step two from both the Godan and the Ichidan are the same? I think it'd probably be more clear if something was added there, for a second I was really confused as to how just removing the 'ru' ending would result in it becoming a negative, until I checked out the example and realised it was the same as with step 2 of the godan.
Nice. I like how the adjectives are separated from the verbs. The format is the same as for the verbs, so I guess, it's fine the way it is. The information is sufficient. The negative past is still missing, thought.^^
Now, the next thing is purely personal preference. a) I find the dotted outlines distracting and would prefer to have them removed. b) There's already a lot of text up there. Is it really necessary to have 2 steps for the change of ending? With the arrows and the green highlighters, isn't one line ( e.g. かく -> かか -> かかなかった ) enough? Just my impression. This is very basic grammar, so I don't really look at the explanation anyway.
Thanks for the feedback! I didn't put negative up yet because I wanted to hear what you thought first. I'll start spreading it out to the other conjugations!
